GE Labeling Would Cost Peanuts, New Study Finds
By: Libby Foley (EWG)
That’s less than a penny a day.
With enough time to comply with a labeling requirement, food producers and retailers would face only a minimal, one-time cost, the analysis showed.
The report was commissioned by Consumers Union, the advocacy and policy arm of Consumer Reports, to “resolve the apparent disagreement” between on how much food prices would increase if GE labeling were required.
It noted that food labels are regularly updated for regulatory and non-regulatory purposes, so with a long enough compliance period companies could incorporate GE labels at little to no cost and would not need to discard any products already in stores.
Moreover, given the competitiveness of the food industry, the $2.30 likely wouldn’t be passed on to consumers, the researchers said. This confirms earlier studies that have found that GE labeling would not come at a cost to consumers.
With polls showing overwhelming support for GE labeling in Oregon and Colorado, where voters will decide the issue in referendum votes in November, opponents of labeling are spending millions on campaigns aimed at misleading consumers into thinking that food prices will go through the roof. (Full story here)…
Copyright © Environmental Working Group, www.ewg.org. Reproduced with permission
- Just Label It News Roundup 10/13
- Just Label It News Roundup, October 5th
- Farming and Your Tap Water
- Top 10 Reasons to Reject Trump’s Chemical Safety Nominee
- Michael Dourson’s Toxic Wake: Locations Across the US Contaminated by Eight Chemicals “Blessed” by Trump EPA Toxics Nominee